top of page
  • Writer's pictureRob Ervin

Rob Reviews "Arthur the King"


It’s no secret that I am always up for any kind of movie that features heroic animals doing heroic animal things.  I remember seeing the trailer for Arthur the King a while back and being intrigued, but it felt like it got pushed back quite a bit during the strike, and that could either be a good thing or a bad thing.  Honestly, after seeing it I have a mixed bag of feelings.

 

Based on a true story, Mark Wahlberg plays Mikael Lindnord, a famous athlete in endurance racing who flames out after a bad decision costs his team dearly.  Out of the sport for a few years, his wife (Juliet Rylance) convinces him to give it one more shot, even against the odds on every level.  From finances to putting together a team (Simu Lu, Ali Suliman, and Nathalie Emmanuel), he barely makes it to the event.  As things get under way, they meet up with a stray dog that not only “adopts” the team but seems to understand the rugged Dominican Republic terrain in a way that helps keep them in the race but even saves them a couple of times.  As the race proceeds, their bond becomes more than any of them had anticipated.

 

On one hand, this is a very entertaining film.  I am leaving the word “family” out of this because although it has a great message, there is a level of adult language that is unnecessary other than to just “be there”.  For the teens and up, this might not be a bad thing, but for the younger ones perhaps not.  The third act also is a rollercoaster that those younger ones may find too intense.  By the time the credits rolled, I found myself entertained and fully on-board for the ride.

 

On the other hand, this script could have used a lot of work to streamline this story.  I understand the need to connect with the backstory of Arthur specifically, but director Simon Cellan Jones (who also works with Wahlberg in The Family Plan and has done A LOT of television) seems to feel the need to tell Arthur and Mikael’s stories in parallel.  I have seen films that can do this well, but here it seems to drag down the narrative itself.  Also, the race itself takes two-thirds of the film’s total run time which also seems unnecessary.  The deeper the race gets, the more the story picks up its pace but that also seems a bit too-little-too-late in how the story unfolds.  The aforementioned third act acts like rush hour traffic with a speed-up/slow-down pace that seems like it doesn’t know which details to include and not include in the story itself.

 

Arthur the King (take that middle word out and I dare any Gen X-er to not say it in a British accent like John Cleese) is not by any stretch a bad film.  Like I said earlier, I enjoyed the film for what it is, but it is also not a film that I can honestly say I would go out of my way to put in heavy rotation.  For parents, I would say to see it without the full family first and then make the judgement call as to whether to include everyone at that point.

12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page